One line, then stop talking
Lesson 2 of 5 in this module · about 6 minutes · Communication
First, a moment
This moment needs JavaScript. The lesson below reads without it.
Here is the idea behind that moment.
The idea
A banter turn is three steps: notice their words, tone and setting; say one light line in your own style; then pause and leave the next move to them. This is a course method, not a research finding. No study has tested the sequence.
Notice. Listen to what the other person just said, how they said it, and where you both are. A line, a delayed train, a shared task: the setting gives you something you can both see. Their tone tells you how much play fits. A rushed, clipped reply fits less than an easy one.
One line, in your own style. Pick something short and about the moment. Your style can be dry, warm or silly, whichever sounds like you. If you are unsure of your style, module 12 treats it as dials, not types. In this course, use a line in your own voice. It is easier to deliver and easier to join.
Pause. Say nothing more for a few seconds and let them respond. A pause can feel long; let it run anyway. Do not explain the joke. If it needed explaining, drop it.
Two findings bear on why the line should be small and fitted. In one paper of eight experiments, mostly in workplace or group scenarios with online samples, a joke that fit the moment raised how confident and competent the person seemed, and one that misjudged the setting lowered perceived competence 1. That is one paper, and status in a group is not romantic attraction 1. In one rating study of written openers between strangers, undergraduates scored openers built on jokes poorly 2. Raters judged written vignettes, not live conversations 2.
Neither finding tells you how to be funny. They are a reason to read the moment before you speak. Humor also tends to run in both directions in early attraction, so what the other person says back is part of the exchange 3. Those studies are correlational and cannot say that humor caused interest 3.
Why it matters
A joke that fits the moment is easy to join. One that ignores the moment, or arrives with an explanation, gives the other person work to do.
What it looks like
Example
The departure board says “delayed” for the third time. Ingrid, 44, beside you, reads it like a verdict. You say, “I think the board is writing a novel.” Then you stop and look at the board with her. After a few seconds she says, “Chapter three: still delayed.” You smile and say nothing more.
The same moment, handled the other way
Counterexample
Same platform. You say the novel line, and her smile is small. You add, “Because it keeps changing the story, like a book, get it?” The line needed no help, and the explanation took the play out of it. Ingrid says “Mm” and checks her phone.
The one thing to remember
The rule
Say one light line in your own style, then pause and leave the next move to them.
The pause is part of the line. If they add to it, you have something to answer. If they do not, you lose nothing by returning to ordinary talk.
Try it now
Item 1 of this lesson’s set: A line for the signal board. Pick the line that fits the moment, and the pause after it.
In the real world (optional)
If you like, the next time you make a light remark in an ordinary conversation, say it once and let a pause run before you add anything.
What this doesn’t tell you
The studies are of groups at work, written vignettes and online samples. They do not show that a fitted joke makes anyone like you, and they say nothing about how one person will respond. The sequence is the course’s own method. A pause does not guarantee a reply.
Why do we believe this?
Each numbered mark in the text opens the evidence behind that sentence. Every claim in this course carries one of five labels.
- Well supported
- A meta-analysis or several independent studies agree, with no serious failure to replicate.
- Supported with caveats
- Several studies agree, with stated limits such as student samples or lab settings.
- Plausible
- One study, or indirect evidence from a nearby question.
- Speculative
- An idea or argument that hasn't been directly tested.
- Marketing claim
- Something a seller says about their product, without published evidence.
Evidence: PlausibleHumour can raise how confident and competent someone seems when it fits the moment, but an inappropriate joke lowers perceived competence and can cost status.
Why this label
One study, or indirect evidence from a nearby question. Across eight experiments, successful humour raised status in new and existing relationships through perceived confidence and competence, while telling a joke that misjudged the setting signalled low competence. Telling a joke at all signalled confidence, whether or not it was appropriate.
What it does not show
- Single paper with eight experiments, mostly workplace or group scenarios and online samples.
- Status in groups is not the same as romantic attraction.
- Abstract read only; sizes of effects not checked.
Who it applies to
Depends on the setting and the people involved.
Source
- Bitterly, T. B., Brooks, A. W., Schweitzer, M. E. (2017). Risky business: When humor increases and decreases status., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112(3), 431-455.
Evidence: PlausibleIn ratings of imagined approaches between strangers, openers built on jokes, empty compliments or sexual references scored poorly, and openers that showed helpfulness, generosity or cultural interests scored well.
Why this label
One study, or indirect evidence from a nearby question. A rating study with 205 undergraduates found this pattern. A larger follow-up reportedly grouped openers into good-mate, compliment, sex and humour clusters, with humour openers preferred by female raters; that is known here only from a search summary. The pattern is about how a written opener is judged, not about real outcomes.
What it does not show
- Raters judged written vignettes, not live approaches.
- The sample was undergraduates in one country, and the vignettes were a man approaching a woman.
- A follow-up is reported, from a search summary only, to have found humour openers preferred by one group of raters; its abstract was not seen.
Who it applies to
A pattern across groups of people, not a statement about any one person.
Sources
- Bale, C., Morrison, R., Caryl, P. G. (2006). Chat-up lines as male sexual displays, Personality and Individual Differences 40(4), 655-664.
- Cooper, M., O’Donnell, D., Caryl, P. G., Morrison, R., Bale, C. (2007). Chat-up lines as male displays: Effects of content, sex, and personality, Personality and Individual Differences 43(5), 1075-1085.
Evidence: Supported with caveatsHumour works in both directions in early attraction: people who were attracted tended to start more humour and respond more warmly to the other person's, and ratings of a partner's humour went with romantic interest.
Why this label
Several studies agree, with stated limits such as student samples or lab settings. Three studies found that attraction came first in the sequence for both sexes (attracted people made and appreciated more humour), and a further set found that evaluating someone's humour predicted interest in them. Being funny is one side of the exchange; responding to the other person's humour is the other.
What it does not show
- Student and online-dating samples; two labs, correlational designs, direction of cause not settled.
- One paper frames humour production as a male trait and evaluation as a female one; the other found both sexes did both. Do not teach it as a gender rule.
- Self-reported or rated humour, not independently scored funniness.
- Abstracts read only.
Who it applies to
A pattern across groups of people, not a statement about any one person.
Sources
- Li, N. P., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K. M., Jonason, P. K., Pasisz, D. J., Aumer, K. (2009). An Evolutionary Perspective on Humor: Sexual Selection or Interest Indication?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(7), 923-936.
- Wilbur, C. J., Campbell, L. (2011). Humor in Romantic Contexts: Do Men Participate and Women Evaluate?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(7), 918-929.
- Hall, J. A. (2015). Sexual Selection and Humor in Courtship: A Case for Warmth and Extroversion, Evolutionary Psychology 13(3).
More practice
The rest of the set, One line, then stop talking: exercises: 2 items, about 3 minutes. Choose or order the ways of saying a line that fit what you mean. Open the exercise set.
Go further
Outside talks, videos and pages on the topics this lesson cites. Nothing from them loads until you follow a link, and a link is not an endorsement: read the note under each one.
Marni Kinrys: "You Think You're Pretty Smooth, Don't You?" She's Flirting. Not Being Mean.
Kinrys's short presents playful teasing and mock challenge as a sign of attraction and advises playing back rather than withdrawing. Relevant to engaged versus merely polite behaviour.
Keep in mind. Anecdotal; teasing can be friendly, polite or unkind, and is not by itself a sign of romantic interest. Check for reciprocity over several turns.